Will
You Dream For Me?*
A
Qualitative Study of the Dream Helper Ceremony
(part
2)
Data Analysis Procedures
Interviews
with sixteen dream helpers (H) and four seekers (S) were coded with a letter and
number combination indicating the type of interview and the order in which the
interviews were transcribed. "H1"
is the first "helper" interview converted from tape to document.
The order of transcription is not necessarily the same order recorded, as
the taped interviews were mixed in with other portions of the seminar as the
interview opportunities occurred.
Interview data was transcribed
and consolidated into common response groups to determine themes relevant to the
research questions. Interview
responses were assigned to data groups corresponding to the theoretical
framework established for the study. An interview matrix is displayed
as Table One, which depicts how each interview question relates to the two
research questions. All of the
interview questions shed some light on both research questions, while some are
more strongly related to only one. Individual
interview responses may shift the emphasis to one research question or the
other, depending upon the answer provided.
Table
1
Strength of Relationship Between Research and Interview
Questions
"…dream
for others?
Interview
response's relationship to Research Question One:
|
Interview
Question
|
"…gain
a personal benefit?" Interview response's
relationship to Research Question Two:
|
Strong
|
Do you think the seeker was helped by your dream?
|
Medium
|
Medium
|
(Seeker helped by) the other dreams in your group?
|
Medium
|
Strong
|
Were other's dreams related to the seeker's issue?
|
Medium
|
Weak
|
Did the seeker's issue relate to things in your life?
(Did you have a similar personal experience?)
|
Strong
|
Weak
|
Do you now have a connection with the person you were
helping/helped by?
|
Medium
|
Weak
|
Is it strengthened as a result of the ceremony?
|
Weak
|
Strong
|
Would you do it (repeat DHC) again?
|
Strong
|
Strong
|
Why would you (not)
do it again?
|
Strong
|
Medium
|
How do you think the Dream Helper Ceremony works?
|
Weak
|
Strong
|
What do you think we learned about dreams?
|
Medium
|
Qualitative Data Analysis. Material
obtained through interviews was analyzed for impressions and opinions which
expressed recurring themes about specific aspects of the Dream Helper Ceremony.
The triangulation technique of obtaining data from multiple sources was
employed to ensure arrival at corroborated conclusions (Eisner, 1998, p. 55).
The study plan was to obtain secondary
interviews where information was missing or incomplete; however, all interviews
were complete with no follow-up necessary.
Quantitative Data Analysis. Interviewee responses were
tabulated with an interpreted "yes/no" response to common questions.
Responses that were clearly affirmative in nature were tabulated as
"yes;" while negative, "not sure," or "lack of
knowledge" responses were tabulated as a "no."
The interpreted summary is presented as Table Two.
While the "yes/no" interpretations of respondents' answers do
not accurately reflect the rich detail conveyed by the interview responses, it
was a useful analysis tool for exposing trends and groupings of similar
responses.
Table
2
Simplified Interview Responses
Interview
|
Seeker Helped?
|
Dreams Relate
to Issue?
|
Issue Relate
To You?
|
Connect?
|
Would You
Do It Again?
|
H1
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H2
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H3
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H4
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H5
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H6
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H7
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H8
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H9
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H10
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H11
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
H12
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H13
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H14
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
H15
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
H16
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
S1
|
Yes
|
No
|
*
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
S2
|
Yes
|
No
|
*
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
S3
|
?
|
?
|
*
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
S4
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
*
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Total
Yes
Total
No
|
19
1
|
17
3
|
10
6
|
18
2
|
20
0
|
Data Analysis Conclusions
The ability to dream for each other (research question one) implies that
we can intentionally invite a theme or prescribe a purpose to our dreams.
A single act of receiving a dream that another individual subsequently
views as enlightening to his specific personal issue is a compelling piece of
evidence that we can deliberately dream for each other under certain conditions.
Information subsets influencing
how the first research question is answered include: interview responses
presenting views on dream incubation, the usefulness or relevance of the
information, and the source of information and dream symbology.
Information subsets to corroborate an affirmative answer for research
question two include: respondents viewing the exercise as beneficial, gaining
insight about personal experiences, developing or enhancing a personal
relationship, expanding one's appreciation for the value of dream life, or a
willingness to invest personal time in a future Dream Helper Ceremony.
Dreams can be influenced (incubated).
Seventeen of the twenty interviewees viewed at least some of the dreams
as related to the seeker's issue. In
one dream sharing group a helper told of dreaming about "teaching two
little girls," and your researcher dreamed of a "pending legal battle
over a contested will," both of which the seeker declared as "direct
hits." Several helpers
reported dreams in which their seeker actually appeared. One helper put it this way:
"I learned that [dreams] are
a lot more powerful than I thought they were. I didn't realize they could be in that psychic realm.
I knew dreams were in a different realm because they are unconscious when
you're sleeping and your subconscious is giving you these images.
But I didn't know they could be that specific and directed.
I didn't know you could really direct them in that way. That was very neat."
Communication occurs in dreams.
Dream communication can be concluded to have occurred when the dream
theme of a person unaware of the seeker's issue is viewed as strongly relating
to the issue at hand. The
conclusion is even stronger when the helper has had no corresponding life
experiences from which to draw on the subconscious memory.
Having previously declared my researcher bias, you may take that into
consideration as you evaluate my personal dream experience with the "legal
battle."
"I dreamed of having a rich
aunt who had recently died while a talented young violinist was a temporary
guest in her home. The violinist
subsequently presented two unsigned wills (which differed only in dollar amount)
leaving him substantial portions of her estate.
His argument was that the dear lady had simply died before making up her
mind how much to leave him. My aunt
had shared her desire to be rid of her 'no longer welcome' guest, and didn't
know how to go about it. I was
certain that she had no intention of leaving him an inheritance and I suspected
foul play. I awakened from the dream while considering legal
options."
In my waking life I have no rich
aunts, no experience with wills, and know of no guest musicians, welcome or not.
Our seeker's issue was about a divorce litigation that included a house,
pension, and visitation with two little step-granddaughters as subjects of
disagreement. He viewed several
dreams in our group as clear "hits" relating to his situation, and
declared that my 'legal battle' dream, "…might be prophetic."
Dreams can contain helpful
information. The body of
interview data offers no clear and compelling reports of messages received in
the dreams. However, several of the
helpers reported that the discussions brought out the symbology, which was then
translated into helpful information for the seekers. "Since prayer was one of the main recommendations, a lot
of it's going to be up to him and the Creative Forces how this plays out."
The point of the DHC was to help specific individuals, and 19 of the 20
interviewees responded in the affirmative to the "…seeker helped?"
question. Therefore, the
unavoidable conclusion must be that the dreams did indeed contain helpful
information even in the absence of explicit advice on a specific situation.
Even the dissenting seeker who was tallied as "no" because he
wasn't clearly affirmative, had this to say about the process, "I was
helped with some ideas, particularly with expressing my creativity and
inventiveness--that came up in some of the dreams."
Sharing dreams is beneficial.
The interview data contained a broad spectrum of information that was
easily interpreted as beneficial to the participants.
Examples include: a positive
attitude about the process, a willingness to participate in the DHC again,
feelings of good will toward others in the group, and a better understanding of
a personal situation and the options for dealing with it.
Two helpers stated the value of sharing dream information this way:
"That emotions, or really
even simple symbols, things that we call crazy dreams can have a very deep
insight…that a shoe isn't really a shoe, it could mean that you are about to
travel on, you see footprints. It's
not really what it appears to be. It
has a much deeper meaning if you're able to discuss it."
"…it's neat to see how a
group of people can help one person, instead of one on one.
You can get more feedback and information in a group."
Chapter
IV. Findings
Research Question One
"Do
DHC participants believe they can dream for another person as revealed by their
responses during a semi-structured interview about the seminar?"
Overall responses to several interview questions demonstrate that the
interviewees hold a belief that they can dream for another person, or that
others can dream for them. Relevant
samples include:
"Because it gives people a
chance to really focus on something about themselves, and about the person
they're dreaming for."
"The first time I did it, I
was being dreamed for, and I found it really helpful."
"If I were in some kind of
dilemma, I would love to have people dream for me too."
"Well, I'd like to actually
be in the seat of the person being dreamed for."
"Right at the end, when
'looking in the mirror' and getting the name of the dream, at that point I
realized that element of the dream applied to her, but it [also] absolutely
applied to my issue."
"I really liked being on the
dreaming side of it, but it would be cool to be dreamed for also."
"I think dreams are
wonderful gifts from God, and I wouldn't mind one day being helped myself like
that."
Research Question Two
"Did
people gain a personal benefit from participation in the exercise as revealed by
their views expressed during a post-seminar interview?"
All of the interviewees believed the seeker was helped in at least some
way. All twenty also demonstrated
their belief that participation was beneficial by expressing a willingness to
undertake the DHC again, many with great enthusiasm, "Absolutely!"
The top three reasons cited for repeating the DHC were
"helpful" (60%), desire to be the target person (15%), and the feeling
of connectedness (15%).
Here
is how two people expressed some of the more subtle benefits of participating in
the Dream Helper Ceremony:
"Even if the dreams don't
appear relevant, or if sometimes it's a stretch to make them relevant, just the
fact that someone else is interested and willing to take the time and energy to
invest in the other person's problem…is helpful."
"[I learned] that they can
be helpful for more than one person; that even though you may be dreaming for
someone else, there's probably still messages in the dream for yourself, and
that even the whole group can gain insight from all the dreams together."
To
continue to Part 3 of this report, Click Here!
|