What does Edgar Cayce have in common with Stephen
Covey? If you've studied the habits of any seven effective people you may recognize the
teachings of Norman Vincent Peale, or maybe even Benjamin Franklin. You've probably heard
of Mary Baker Eddy, and Emmet Fox, perhaps, but what about Phineaus Quinby? Antoine
Mesmer? What all these people have in common is their shared relationship to "New
Thought."
New Thought is as old as the quote from Romans
12:2 which provides the title of this essay. New Thought is as contemporary as the New Age
and finds expression in current bestselling teachers such as Anthony Robbins and creation
theologist Mathew Fox. Edgar Cayce's own teachings has its orgins within the same
Mesmerism as New Thought and many of his tenets are indistinguishable from New Thought If
the story of Edgar Cayce finds its home as a chapter in the history of hypnosis, then the
chapter on hypnosis in the history of spirituality would devote many pages to the story of
"New Thought."
I have found the recent book New Thought: A
Practical American Spirituality (Crossroad Publishling) to be an excellent historical
overview on the New Thought movement. The authors, C. Alan Anderson (Professor of
Philosophy and Religion at Curry College, Milton, Massachusetts) and Deborah G.
Whitehouse, present an excellent philosophical perspective on the ideas within New Thought
and their relation to other approaches to spirituality.
William James considered New Thought to be the one
truly original contribution made by American to spiritual philosophy. New Thought is truly
a do-it-yourself path, built by many uneducated, simple people who pioneered on the
frontiers of the American soul. Today its creative spirit continues to build new inroads
into a practical, creative spirituality.
Hypnosis marks its orgins to Antoine Mesmer's work
in France back in the mid-1700s. Benjamin Franklin went to France to investigate
Mesmerism. By the turn of the 19th century this "new" healing phenomenon had
sparked many enthusiasts within the United States. New Thought typically marks its
beginnings to Phineas Parkhurst Quinby, born in Lebanon, New Hampsire in 1802. In his
thirties he was introduced to Mesmerism by a traveling show. He practiced magnetic
healing, but then innovated the approach with his own insight that the healing was direct,
mind to mind. Later he concluded that it is "truth" that is the real cure. He
believed he had re-discovered the healing power of Jesus.
Among Quinby's patients was Mary Baker Eddy,
founder of Christian Science, and Emma Curtis Hopkins, who as "teacher of teachers of
New Thought," had among her pupils Ernest Holmes (author of Science of Mind and
founder of the Church of Religious Science) and Myrtle and Charles Fillmore.(founders of
Unity church). Today, the New Thought Alliance has many members, and quite an extensive
range of thought, including debate over particulars. Although there is a common spirit to
the various New Thought camps and many New Age movements, practitioners and philosophers
separate themselves from the others on the basis of a postulate here, a practice there.
The debates keep things interesting.
The fundamental psychology of New Thought is that
the mind is the builder, that what you expect is what you get, that your beliefs create
your reality. Its metaphysics is that of "idealism," (shared by Plato, Cayce and
Jung), which assumes that a non-material dimension of psychic images is the primary
reality, and that physical matter is a resultant manifestation. New Thought has a
mysticism, too, which holds that unity or harmony with the Creator God is the fundamental
requirement for both the pleasurable and practical transformation of one's life.
Not one to rest on its scriptures, New Thought
keeps thinking new thoughts. A major innovation is "Process" New Thought, to be
distinguished from "Substance" New Thought. In keeping with new philosophical
trends and scientific developments, such as quantum physics, among others, Process New
Thought emphasizes that the soul is less a "thing" than a history of
experiences. The personal nature of the Creator and the personal nature of human beings is
what Creator and creature have in common, and the co-creative companionship between the
two gives reality a run for its money. We're always making up something new!
Just as I have found the study of Carl Jung to
give an important added dimension to the spiritual terrain covered by Cayce, so too the
study of New Thought adds historical breath to the religious implications of the Cayce
material. In There is a River, it describes Edgar Cayce as feeling "creepy" when
he read about the amazing similarities between his life and work and that of Andrew
Jackson Davis, who also stumbled upon Mesmerism and began giving trance-induced psychic
discourses. It is not simply a matter of those who are ignorant of history being doomed to
repeat it, but also a fact that there are certain patterns within Creation that seem to
beg for recognition and expression. A historical and comparative approach can help us
provide that awareness and co-create the underlying reality.
Just
Surfing the Book Columns?
Try These Links:
Read Next Article
Read Previous One
Buy New Thought: A Practical American Spirituality now!
|