|
Our
second example comes from the
work of Carl
Jung and his Psychological Types.
Jung proposed a
psychological analogy to
the fourfold aspect
of
wholeness in his description of
the four "functions."
These four are thinking
and feeling, intuition and
sensation.
In this
system, thinking
and feeling
are
complementary, mutually
exclusivemodes of
evaluation. When we evaluate by means of the thinking
function, we use external, objective
criteria, such as
logic. But when we evaluate by means
of the feeling
function, we use internal, subjective criteria,
such as
personal values and
preferences. Often
we are
confronted with something that "makes sense"
but that
doesn't "feel right," or
vice versa. Such apparent
contradictions arise because thinking and feeling
base
their judgments on different sources
of information,
sources that are appropriate only
to the particular
function.
Intuition and
sensation are the
complementary,
mutually exclusive modes of obtaining
information.
Their purpose is to discover what
is, not to evaluate it.
The intuitive function gathers
information through
subjective means of perception, such
as hunchesit
sniffs out the possible. The sensation function
gathers
information through objectively oriented
modes of
perception, such as the eyes and hands. For the sensation
function, "beholding is believing,"
while the intuitive
function believes in its dreams. A stone, to the sensation
function, is a stone; while for the
intuitive function, it
might also be a paperweight, or even a companion.
Jung noted
that everyone has all four
functions
operative in their lives. One function, however, is usually
dominant from birth. Part of the
life task is then to
develop the abilities of the other three functions
so that
the four can operate as a harmonious whole. The function
that is the most difficult to
develop is the one that is
complementary to the dominant
function, for it is
experienced as being opposed to that dominant function.
For the person who approaches
the world primarily
through the feeling function, the
thinking function is
experienced as a cold and lifeless tyrant whose
constant
187
|
|