|
It is the transcendence of duality
that is central to the
mystery. The central pole of the
Sun Dance lodge is
forked, as an expression of this
principle, and is thus
reminiscent of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.
The One is separated so that it may become consciously
aware that it is One. That is perhaps the mystery.
We can go around and around about
this point. There
are many mythological
spinoffs of this
central,
Universal Idea.
The lesson for community is that
the tension between
the Many and the One can
be a creative tension. But
when operating from a dualistic frame of reference,
the
choices are seen only as being either
to "surrender the
ego" and be one with the
group, the community, the
Whole, or to separate oneself as an
"individualist." But
the initiation into the mystery comes when
the tension
is sustained until the time arrives
that it is possible to
transcend dualistic consciousness. Then we
experience
ourselves neither as merely individuals
nor as merely
one with the community or Whole, but somehow as both.
As a result of the dream story
I've told here, I would
now call my imaginary experiment
in revelation the
"Sundance Experiment." The
basic hypothesis of this
experiment is that a community
of people can obtain
from their dreams the necessary symbolic
patterns to
create their own appropriate
method with which to
experience the secret of the universal mystery central to
the mythology of the Sundance motif. Evidence
of this
possibility has been found in the dream incubations
and
community dream enactments conducted
at Atlantic
University. The A.R.E. Dream Research Project showed
that it is possible for contemporary dreams
to provide
further clues to the nature of the mythological Sundance
motif. Inasmuch as the Community
Dream Journal
provides a focus for
dreams about the concept of
community, it too may elicit dreams that will contribute
to the Sundance Experiment.
In fact, subscribers'
dreams (see page 132) are already reflecting aspects of
Sundance imagery as well as a concern
for the tension
between individual needs and group unity.
It does seem
119
|
|